tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36994129.post1660662127643617221..comments2024-02-26T21:27:17.091+13:00Comments on The Fundy Post: Swedish experts talk about their livesPaulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08024440694895271805noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36994129.post-82462800381003838522007-05-02T11:35:00.000+12:002007-05-02T11:35:00.000+12:00"Something seems to be missing in the reasoning he...<I>"Something seems to be missing in the reasoning here"</I><BR/><BR/>Yeah, foundations, walls, windows, doors and a roof.<BR/>He is convinced he is right. And when your favourite book is the bible, that's all that matters.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13602773165700078166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36994129.post-55527221024166503942007-05-02T02:36:00.000+12:002007-05-02T02:36:00.000+12:00"Bradford is saying: babies should be treated as f..."Bradford is saying: babies should be treated as fully realised humans from the moment that they are born. That means, that before birth, babies are still babies according to Sue, not fetuses or tissue." <BR/><BR/>Something seems to be missing in the reasoning here.Paulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08024440694895271805noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36994129.post-38075916831658044512007-05-02T01:22:00.000+12:002007-05-02T01:22:00.000+12:00Bookie, go back to andy's blog and read is post ab...Bookie, go back to andy's blog and read is post about "Unborn babies are fully realised humans."<BR/>You are not dealing with someone with some serious plot lossage and a complete lack of reading comprehension.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13602773165700078166noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36994129.post-29076055049712773392007-05-01T15:31:00.000+12:002007-05-01T15:31:00.000+12:00Andy, I followed your link but didn't find anythin...Andy, I followed your link but didn't find anything that could be described as a response to this post.<BR/><BR/>Is there a particular post at the "section 59 blog" in response to this one, or is the whole blog the response. This would seem to be a rather excessive way of going about things.<BR/><BR/>Interesting blog though. Are you at all familiar with the terms "fair use" and how it differs to the phrase "wholesale theft of other peoples work"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36994129.post-62366105531146447402007-05-01T10:46:00.000+12:002007-05-01T10:46:00.000+12:00Funny you should mention John Key.http://www.scoop...Funny you should mention John Key.<BR/><BR/>http://www.scoop.co.nz/sections/nzpolitics.html<BR/><BR/>Scoop asks here whether Key is full of HOLLOW rhetoric.<BR/><BR/>I suppose he was, if he is a hollow man? Are you suggesting this Paul?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36994129.post-54890828012195139862007-04-30T23:40:00.000+12:002007-04-30T23:40:00.000+12:00the Section 59 blog for my response...Cheers.<A HREF="http://section59.blogspot.com" REL="nofollow">the Section 59 blog</A> for my response...<BR/><BR/>Cheers.Andyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05656956423924982169noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36994129.post-41159441355644556972007-04-30T22:17:00.000+12:002007-04-30T22:17:00.000+12:00I recall--perhaps incorrectly--a controversy some ...I recall--perhaps incorrectly--a controversy some years ago when Bull Allen, a vegetarian, appeared in a KFC advertisement in which he bit enthusiastically into a leg of fried chicken.<BR/><BR/>Such slipping of semantics seems to me analogous to those who would retain the protection of Section 59 (although I'm aware an analogy could be similar cast for those who would see it repealed). Let's have our chicken but not eat it, too.harvestbirdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11898121062164798211noreply@blogger.com