Monday, July 09, 2012

Against interpretation

      Upper Harbour Local Board chairwoman Margaret Miles says the board was concerned it would take up car parks and commuters would not have time to stop and look at the tower.

"I'm sorry but if you're wanting to catch a bus in the morning I don't think you've got the time to start reading about what this structure is," she says.   
Auckland needs faster art, sculpture that can be interpreted in no time at all or, better still, sculpture that can interpret itself. Some sort of boil-in-the-bag aesthetic is required here. At the same time, such sculpture will need to be flat, to avoid taking up valuable parking spaces. It's a tough call, making art in a competitive, high-paced,  commuting environment.

Are New Zealand's young artists up to it? Maybe they could just paint the parking spaces with meaningless, empty, gestures. Or would that be too challenging for a Monday morning? What kind of art will meet the needs of today's motorist, today's commuter?

Where is this post going? Who knows? Why don't we stop right now and instead listen to Stereolab?  But before we go, we must thank David Slack for the story. Allons.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I'll have one large Mac Mannerist Movement, a Decaf Kafka latte and a Francis Bacon Burger to go thanks.